Posts Tagged ‘Lord Monckton’

FUD – an acronym for Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt. A practice used to generate fear in people so they will demand change or reject valid information.

Is global warming for real, or is it a fabrication? Most scientists and climatologists around the world state that global warming is a problem that we and our children must address. The biggest groups of people that disagree with global warming seem to rely on pseudo science, religious convictions, or political positions.

Chris Monckton

Dr. John Abraham

A noted global warming skeptic named Christopher Monckton from the UK gave a presentation at Bethel College and stated that global warming is not an issue. The problem: Monckton lacks scientific background and credentials to act as a valid analyst of this topic. Dr. John Abraham, a professor at the University of St. Thomas, viewed Monckton’s slides and pointed out how each point either relied on old or incorrectly-interpreted data, or used non-facts to promote Monckton’s views. Click here to watch Dr. Abraham’s excellent analysis and dissection of Monckton’s attempts to dismiss global warming using pseudo science and unverifiable quotes. Monckton’s response was an unprovoked and unwarranted attack on Dr. Abraham and the University of St. Thomas.

I’ve discussed this topic with friends and colleagues for the past 4 years and have seen people rely on political and religious positions to justify their disbelief in global warming. One colleague tried to use half truths as a reason to doubt science and said “he only believes in the law of gravity.”  I sadly told him there is no law of gravity, which he did not believe. A friend told me he didn’t believe in global warming because God wouldn’t allow us to destroy ourselves. I wondered then (and now) how much damage 3000+ nuclear weapons in US and Russian arsenals could do to our planet… I’m guessing it wouldn’t take that many to destroy the planet and they do exist, so what does that prove to this perspective? Both cases show that some people have made up their minds about something and will look for anything to validate that position – you can’t discuss something with someone that refuses to be open-minded, so don’t bother.

Science attempts to find answers, whether or not those answers agree or disagree with current or previous political and religious opinions. When people use pseudo science, rumors, outright lies, or misstate the truth to bolster their opinion, then you have to question their ethics. I believe that trying to hide what you are or want or promote means you have doubts people will believe you if you are honest. Why? I believe that scientists are people, but they are held accountable to their peers who review their works. Good and ethical scientists try to find answers and embrace the truth, but scientists are human and can be wrong. Science is based on asking questions and trying to find the truth, not twisting facts to fit their political and religious viewpoints.

I applaud Dr.Abraham, an expert with credentials to back his positions, for taking the time to put together a presentation that shows the inconvenient facts, and hope other scientists continue to stand up for the truth.

Just my two cents…

==============================================================================

JULY 30, 2010 –  A Followup

Another conspiracy? Please! Since Dr. Abraham’s presentation that refutes Chris Monckton’s position on climate change, Monckton has used mail and interviews to lash out at Dr. Abraham, who refuses to be pulled into a series of personal attacks. Dr. Abraham has stated the scientific reasons why Monckton’s presentation is wrong, and Monckton responded by letters to the University of St. Thomas demanding that they punish Dr. Abraham. Bravo to Dr. Abraham for refusing to let the facts be overridden by Monckton’s non-scientific outlandish claims, and bravo to the university of St. Thomas for supporting their professor and for refusing to be bullied into placating a non-expert. For someone that bandies about the word ‘libel’ so often, Monckton should consider his own comments about Dr.Abraham, the University of St. Thomas, and the university President.

For more information, click here.